Volume 4, issue 1 (2004)

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 16
Issue 4, 1827–2458
Issue 3, 1253–1825
Issue 2, 621–1251
Issue 1, 1–620

Volume 15, 6 issues

Volume 14, 6 issues

Volume 13, 6 issues

Volume 12, 4 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 4 issues

Volume 9, 4 issues

Volume 8, 4 issues

Volume 7, 4 issues

Volume 6, 5 issues

Volume 5, 4 issues

Volume 4, 2 issues

Volume 3, 2 issues

Volume 2, 2 issues

Volume 1, 2 issues

The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Editorial Interests
Editorial Procedure
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Author Index
To Appear
ISSN (electronic): 1472-2739
ISSN (print): 1472-2747
Enrichment over iterated monoidal categories

Stefan Forcey

Algebraic & Geometric Topology 4 (2004) 95–119

arXiv: math.CT/0403152


Joyal and Street note in their paper on braided monoidal categories [Braided tensor categories, Advances in Math. 102(1993) 20–78] that the 2–category V–Cat of categories enriched over a braided monoidal category V is not itself braided in any way that is based upon the braiding of V. The exception that they mention is the case in which V is symmetric, which leads to V–Cat being symmetric as well. The symmetry in V–Cat is based upon the symmetry of V. The motivation behind this paper is in part to describe how these facts relating V and V–Cat are in turn related to a categorical analogue of topological delooping. To do so I need to pass to a more general setting than braided and symmetric categories — in fact the k–fold monoidal categories of Balteanu et al in [Iterated Monoidal Categories, Adv. Math. 176(2003) 277–349]. It seems that the analogy of loop spaces is a good guide for how to define the concept of enrichment over various types of monoidal objects, including k–fold monoidal categories and their higher dimensional counterparts. The main result is that for V a k–fold monoidal category, V–Cat becomes a (k 1)–fold monoidal 2–category in a canonical way. In the next paper I indicate how this process may be iterated by enriching over V–Cat, along the way defining the 3–category of categories enriched over V–Cat. In future work I plan to make precise the n–dimensional case and to show how the group completion of the nerve of V is related to the loop space of the group completion of the nerve of V–Cat.

This paper is an abridged version of ‘Enrichment as categorical delooping I: Enrichment over iterated monoidal categories’, math.CT/0304026.

loop spaces, enriched categories, $n$–categories, iterated monoidal categories
Mathematical Subject Classification 2000
Primary: 18D10
Secondary: 18D20
Forward citations
Received: 29 September 2003
Revised: 1 March 2004
Accepted: 4 March 2004
Published: 6 March 2004
Stefan Forcey
Department of Mathematics
Virginia Tech
460 McBryde Hall
Blacksburg VA 24060