Recent Issues |
| Volume 8, Issue 1 |
| Volume 7, Issue 2 |
| Volume 7, Issue 1 |
| Volume 6, Issue 1 |
| Volume 5, Issue 2 |
| Volume 5, Issue 1 |
| Volume 4, Issue 1 |
| Volume 3, Issue 1 |
| Volume 2, Issue 1 |
| Volume 1, Issue 1 |
|
|
Abstract
|
|
A recent paper by Vaughan,
Smith, and Chopp [Comm. App. Math. Comp. Sci. 1 (2006), 207–228] reported
numerical results for three examples using the immersed interface method (IIM) and
the extended finite element method (X-FEM). The results presented for the IIM
showed first-order accuracy for the solution and inaccurate values of the normal
derivative at the interface. This was due to an error in the implementation. The
purpose of this note is to present correct results using the IIM for the same examples
used in that paper, which demonstrate the expected second-order accuracy in the
maximum norm over all grid points. Results now indicate that on these problems the
IIM and X-FEM methods give comparable accuracy in solution values. With
appropriate interpolation it is also possible to obtain nearly second order
accurate values of the solution and normal derivative at the interface with the
IIM.
|
Keywords
immersed interface method (IIM), elliptic interface
problems, finite difference methods, discontinuous
coefficients, singular source term, convergence order
|
Mathematical Subject Classification 2000
Primary: 65N06, 65N30, 65N50
|
Milestones
Received: 7 July 2008
Accepted: 7 July 2008
Published: 20 September 2008
|
|
|
|
|