#### Volume 15, issue 4 (2011)

 Recent Issues
 The Journal About the Journal Editorial Board Editorial Interests Author Index Editorial procedure Submission Guidelines Submission Page Author copyright form Subscriptions Contacts G&T Publications Author Index To Appear ISSN (electronic): 1364-0380 ISSN (print): 1465-3060
Rigidity of spherical codes

### Henry Cohn, Yang Jiao, Abhinav Kumar and Salvatore Torquato

Geometry & Topology 15 (2011) 2235–2273
##### Abstract

A packing of spherical caps on the surface of a sphere (that is, a spherical code) is called rigid or jammed if it is isolated within the space of packings. In other words, aside from applying a global isometry, the packing cannot be deformed. In this paper, we systematically study the rigidity of spherical codes, particularly kissing configurations. One surprise is that the kissing configuration of the Coxeter–Todd lattice is not jammed, despite being locally jammed (each individual cap is held in place if its neighbors are fixed); in this respect, the Coxeter–Todd lattice is analogous to the face-centered cubic lattice in three dimensions. By contrast, we find that many other packings have jammed kissing configurations, including the Barnes–Wall lattice and all of the best kissing configurations known in four through twelve dimensions. Jamming seems to become much less common for large kissing configurations in higher dimensions, and in particular it fails for the best kissing configurations known in $25$ through $31$ dimensions. Motivated by this phenomenon, we find new kissing configurations in these dimensions, which improve on the records set in 1982 by the laminated lattices.

##### Keywords
rigidity, jamming, packing, spherical codes, kissing problem
Primary: 52C25
Secondary: 52C17