Recent Issues |
| Volume 5, Issue 3 |
| Volume 5, Issue 2 |
| Volume 5, Issue 1 |
| Volume 4, Issue 4 |
| Volume 4, Issue 3 |
| Volume 4, Issue 2 |
| Volume 4, Issue 1 |
| Volume 3, Issue 4 |
| Volume 3, Issue 3 |
| Volume 3, Issue 2 |
| Volume 3, Issue 1 |
| Volume 2, Issue 5 |
| Volume 2, Issue 4 |
| Volume 2, Issue 3 |
| Volume 2, Issue 2 |
| Volume 2, Issue 1 |
| Volume 1, Issue 2 |
| Volume 1, Issue 1 |
|
|
Abstract
|
|
In referendum elections, voters
are frequently required to register simultaneous yes/no votes on multiple proposals.
The separability problem occurs when a voter’s preferred outcome on a proposal or
set of proposals depends on the known or predicted outcomes of other proposals in
the election. Here we investigate cost-consciousness as a potential cause of
nonseparability. We develop a mathematical model of cost-consciousness,
and we show that this model induces nonseparable preferences in all but
the most extreme cases. We show that when outcome costs are distinct,
cost-conscious electorates always exhibit both a weak Condorcet winner and a
weak Condorcet loser. Finally, we show that preferences consistent with our
model of cost-consciousness are rare in randomly generated electorates. We
then discuss the implications of our work and suggest directions for further
research.
|
Keywords
referendum elections, cost-conscious, separability,
separable preferences
|
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 91B12
|
Milestones
Received: 17 September 2010
Revised: 14 February 2011
Accepted: 16 February 2011
Published: 17 January 2012
|
|
|
|
|