Vol. 1, No. 7, 2006

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 12
Issue 3, 249–351
Issue 2, 147–247
Issue 1, 1–146

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 5 issues

Volume 9, 5 issues

Volume 8, 8 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 9 issues

Volume 5, 6 issues

Volume 4, 10 issues

Volume 3, 10 issues

Volume 2, 10 issues

Volume 1, 8 issues

The Journal
Editorial Board
Research Statement
Scientific Advantage
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Author Index
To Appear
ISSN: 1559-3959
A numerical investigation of the effect of boundary conditions and representative volume element size for porous titanium

Hui Shen and L. Catherine Brinson

Vol. 1 (2006), No. 7, 1179–1204

To facilitate the design and application of porous titanium and titanium foam, numerical simulation of their mechanical behavior is essential. The concept of a representative volume element (RVE) is essential to obtain accurate estimates of the properties. Because of the high contrast between the properties of the two phases (pore vs. matrix), it is impractical to obtain a single RVE independent of boundary conditions to provide accurate predictions. We suggest that a set of small domain RVEs can be used instead, as long as the average of the small domains provides a convergent result. Two mixed boundary conditions simulating uniaxial proportional loading were designed and implemented on several 2D and 3D finite element models at different length scales, that is, containing different numbers of pores. The two boundary conditions provide opposite biased responses. Convergence of both the macroscopic and the microscopic elastoplastic responses associated with the boundary conditions is demonstrated here. By this approach, RVEs that are prohibitively large according to Hill’s definition are divided into reasonably small ones associated with special boundary conditions, and the error of predictions associated with model size can be estimated.

representative volume element, titanium foam, microstructure, finite element, boundary condition
Received: 11 January 2006
Accepted: 12 May 2006
Published: 1 November 2006
Hui Shen
Mechanical Engineering Department
Ohio Northern University
Ada, OH 45810
United States
L. Catherine Brinson
Mechanical Engineering Department
Northwestern University
Technological Institute B224
2145 Sheridan Road
Evanston, IL 60208
United States