Vol. 2, No. 2, 2007

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 12
Issue 3, 249–351
Issue 2, 147–247
Issue 1, 1–146

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 5 issues

Volume 9, 5 issues

Volume 8, 8 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 9 issues

Volume 5, 6 issues

Volume 4, 10 issues

Volume 3, 10 issues

Volume 2, 10 issues

Volume 1, 8 issues

The Journal
Cover
Editorial Board
Research Statement
Scientific Advantage
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Subscriptions
Author Index
To Appear
 
ISSN: 1559-3959
Fracture and fatigue crack growth analysis of rail steels

Heshmat A. Aglan and Mahmood Fateh

Vol. 2 (2007), No. 2, 335–346
Abstract

Low carbon baintic steel shows promising potential, especially in critical components such as frogs and switches. Microstructural analysis of J6 bainitic rail steel was performed and compared with the microstructure of premium pearlitic rail steel. The bainitic microstructure revealed a mixture of tempered martensite and ferrite associated with intralath carbides. Typical pearlitic microstructure with a fine lamellar aggregate of very soft and ductile ferrite and very hard carbide cementite was observed. The mechanical properties, plane stress fracture toughness, KIc, and the fatigue crack growth behavior of the two steels were evaluated. Test specimens were machined from railheads of each material using electrical discharge machining (EDM). Rectangular unnotched and notched specimens were used for the mechanical properties and fatigue evaluation respectively. 12T compact tension specimens were used for the KIc evaluation according to ASTM E399. The J6 bainitic steel has ultimate strength, yield strength, and elongation to failure of about 1500 MPa, 1100 MPa, and 13% respectively. These values are higher than those for pearlitic steel. It was found that the average KIc for the bainitic rail steel is 52 MPa m, while that of the premium pearlitic steel is 41 MPa m. Fatigue studies showed that the crack speed for the bainitic steel is lower than that for the pearlitic steel over the entire range of the energy release rate. The bainitic steel exhibits a higher rate of crack deceleration in the second stage, as indicated by the lower slope of the fatigue crack propagation kinetics curve in comparison with the pearlitic steel. This attests to the superior fatigue damage tolerance of the bainitic rail steel and provides evidence to support the superior rolling fatigue damage tolerance of the bainitic rail steel reported in the literature.

Keywords
bainitic steel, fracture toughness, fatigue, pearlitic steel
Milestones
Received: 18 June 2006
Accepted: 15 September 2006
Published: 1 April 2007
Authors
Heshmat A. Aglan
College of Engineering, Architecture, and Physical Sciences
218 Foster Hall
Tuskegee University
Tuskegee, AL 36088
United States
Mahmood Fateh
Federal Railroad Administration
1120 Vermont Ave.
Washington, DC 20590
United States