Volume 11, issue 5 (2011)

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 24
Issue 6, 2971–3570
Issue 5, 2389–2970
Issue 4, 1809–2387
Issue 3, 1225–1808
Issue 2, 595–1223
Issue 1, 1–594

Volume 23, 9 issues

Volume 22, 8 issues

Volume 21, 7 issues

Volume 20, 7 issues

Volume 19, 7 issues

Volume 18, 7 issues

Volume 17, 6 issues

Volume 16, 6 issues

Volume 15, 6 issues

Volume 14, 6 issues

Volume 13, 6 issues

Volume 12, 4 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 4 issues

Volume 9, 4 issues

Volume 8, 4 issues

Volume 7, 4 issues

Volume 6, 5 issues

Volume 5, 4 issues

Volume 4, 2 issues

Volume 3, 2 issues

Volume 2, 2 issues

Volume 1, 2 issues

The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Subscriptions
 
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Policies for Authors
Ethics Statement
 
ISSN 1472-2739 (online)
ISSN 1472-2747 (print)
Author Index
To Appear
 
Other MSP Journals
Delta-discrete $G$–spectra and iterated homotopy fixed points

Daniel G Davis

Algebraic & Geometric Topology 11 (2011) 2775–2814
Abstract

Let G be a profinite group with finite virtual cohomological dimension and let X be a discrete G–spectrum. If H and K are closed subgroups of G, with H K, then, in general, the KH–spectrum XhH is not known to be a continuous KH–spectrum, so that it is not known (in general) how to define the iterated homotopy fixed point spectrum (XhH)hKH. To address this situation, we define homotopy fixed points for delta-discrete G–spectra and show that the setting of delta-discrete G–spectra gives a good framework within which to work. In particular, we show that by using delta-discrete KH–spectra, there is always an iterated homotopy fixed point spectrum, denoted (XhH)hδKH, and it is just XhK.

Additionally, we show that for any delta-discrete G–spectrum Y , there is an equivalence Y hδHhδKH Y hδK. Furthermore, if G is an arbitrary profinite group, there is a delta-discrete G–spectrum Xδ that is equivalent to X and, though XhH is not even known in general to have a KH–action, there is always an equivalence ((Xδ)hδH)hδKH (X δ)hδK. Therefore, delta-discrete L–spectra, by letting L equal H,K, and KH, give a way of resolving undesired deficiencies in our understanding of homotopy fixed points for discrete G–spectra.

Keywords
homotopy fixed point spectrum, discrete $G$–spectrum, iterated homotopy fixed point spectrum
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 55P42, 55P91
References
Publication
Received: 13 June 2010
Accepted: 27 September 2010
Published: 26 September 2011
Authors
Daniel G Davis
Department of Mathematics
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Lafayette LA 70504
USA
http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~dxd0799