Volume 21, issue 7 (2021)

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 22, 1 issue

Volume 21, 7 issues

Volume 20, 7 issues

Volume 19, 7 issues

Volume 18, 7 issues

Volume 17, 6 issues

Volume 16, 6 issues

Volume 15, 6 issues

Volume 14, 6 issues

Volume 13, 6 issues

Volume 12, 4 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 4 issues

Volume 9, 4 issues

Volume 8, 4 issues

Volume 7, 4 issues

Volume 6, 5 issues

Volume 5, 4 issues

Volume 4, 2 issues

Volume 3, 2 issues

Volume 2, 2 issues

Volume 1, 2 issues

The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Editorial Interests
Subscriptions
 
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Policies for Authors
Ethics Statement
 
ISSN (electronic): 1472-2739
ISSN (print): 1472-2747
Author Index
To Appear
 
Other MSP Journals
Most big mapping class groups fail the Tits alternative

Daniel Allcock

Algebraic & Geometric Topology 21 (2021) 3675–3688
Abstract

Let X be a surface, possibly with boundary. Suppose it has infinite genus or infinitely many punctures, or a closed subset which is a disk with a Cantor set removed from its interior. For example, X could be any surface of infinite type with only finitely many boundary components. We prove that the mapping class group of X does not satisfy the Tits alternative. That is, Map(X) contains a finitely generated subgroup that is not virtually solvable and contains no nonabelian free group.

Keywords
mapping class group, Grigorchuk group, Tits alternative
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 57K20
Secondary: 20F38
References
Publication
Received: 31 August 2020
Revised: 1 December 2020
Accepted: 24 December 2020
Published: 28 December 2021
Authors
Daniel Allcock
Department of Mathematics
University of Texas, Austin
Austin, TX
United States
http://www.math.utexas.edu/~allcock