Volume 21, issue 7 (2021)

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 24
Issue 7, 3571–4137
Issue 6, 2971–3570
Issue 5, 2389–2970
Issue 4, 1809–2387
Issue 3, 1225–1808
Issue 2, 595–1223
Issue 1, 1–594

Volume 23, 9 issues

Volume 22, 8 issues

Volume 21, 7 issues

Volume 20, 7 issues

Volume 19, 7 issues

Volume 18, 7 issues

Volume 17, 6 issues

Volume 16, 6 issues

Volume 15, 6 issues

Volume 14, 6 issues

Volume 13, 6 issues

Volume 12, 4 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 4 issues

Volume 9, 4 issues

Volume 8, 4 issues

Volume 7, 4 issues

Volume 6, 5 issues

Volume 5, 4 issues

Volume 4, 2 issues

Volume 3, 2 issues

Volume 2, 2 issues

Volume 1, 2 issues

The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Subscriptions
 
Submission Guidelines
Submission Page
Policies for Authors
Ethics Statement
 
ISSN 1472-2739 (online)
ISSN 1472-2747 (print)
Author Index
To Appear
 
Other MSP Journals
Most big mapping class groups fail the Tits alternative

Daniel Allcock

Algebraic & Geometric Topology 21 (2021) 3675–3688
Abstract

Let X be a surface, possibly with boundary. Suppose it has infinite genus or infinitely many punctures, or a closed subset which is a disk with a Cantor set removed from its interior. For example, X could be any surface of infinite type with only finitely many boundary components. We prove that the mapping class group of X does not satisfy the Tits alternative. That is, Map(X) contains a finitely generated subgroup that is not virtually solvable and contains no nonabelian free group.

Keywords
mapping class group, Grigorchuk group, Tits alternative
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 57K20
Secondary: 20F38
References
Publication
Received: 31 August 2020
Revised: 1 December 2020
Accepted: 24 December 2020
Published: 28 December 2021
Authors
Daniel Allcock
Department of Mathematics
University of Texas, Austin
Austin, TX
United States
http://www.math.utexas.edu/~allcock