Vol. 9, No. 4, 2015

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 18
Issue 12, 2133–2308
Issue 11, 1945–2131
Issue 10, 1767–1943
Issue 9, 1589–1766
Issue 8, 1403–1587
Issue 7, 1221–1401
Issue 6, 1039–1219
Issue 5, 847–1038
Issue 4, 631–846
Issue 3, 409–629
Issue 2, 209–408
Issue 1, 1–208

Volume 17, 12 issues

Volume 16, 10 issues

Volume 15, 10 issues

Volume 14, 10 issues

Volume 13, 10 issues

Volume 12, 10 issues

Volume 11, 10 issues

Volume 10, 10 issues

Volume 9, 10 issues

Volume 8, 10 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 8 issues

Volume 5, 8 issues

Volume 4, 8 issues

Volume 3, 8 issues

Volume 2, 8 issues

Volume 1, 4 issues

The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Editors' interests
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1944-7833 (online)
ISSN 1937-0652 (print)
 
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
The Elliott–Halberstam conjecture implies the Vinogradov least quadratic nonresidue conjecture

Terence Tao

Vol. 9 (2015), No. 4, 1005–1034
Abstract

For each prime p, let n(p) denote the least quadratic nonresidue modulo p. Vinogradov conjectured that n(p) = O(pε) for every fixed ε > 0. This conjecture follows from the generalized Riemann hypothesis and is known to hold for almost all primes p but remains open in general. In this paper, we show that Vinogradov’s conjecture also follows from the Elliott–Halberstam conjecture on the distribution of primes in arithmetic progressions, thus providing a potential “nonmultiplicative” route to the Vinogradov conjecture. We also give a variant of this argument that obtains bounds on short centered character sums from “Type II” estimates of the type introduced recently by Zhang and improved upon by the Polymath project or from bounds on the level of distribution on variants of the higher-order divisor function. In particular, an improvement over the Burgess bound would be obtained if one had Type II estimates with level of distribution above 2 3 (when the conductor is not cube-free) or 3 4 (if the conductor is cube-free); morally, one would also obtain such a gain if one had distributional estimates on the third or fourth divisor functions τ3 or τ4 at level above 2 3 or 3 4, respectively. Some applications to the least primitive root are also given.

Keywords
quadratic nonresidue, Elliott–Halberstam conjecture, character sums, Burgess bound
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 11L40
Secondary: 11L20
Milestones
Received: 26 October 2014
Revised: 12 January 2015
Accepted: 18 March 2015
Published: 30 May 2015
Authors
Terence Tao
Department of Mathematics
University of California, Los Angeles
405 Hilgard Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555
United States