Vol. 11, No. 6, 2017

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 11
Issue 10, 2213–2445
Issue 9, 1967–2212
Issue 8, 1739–1965
Issue 7, 1489–1738
Issue 6, 1243–1488
Issue 5, 1009–1241
Issue 4, 767–1007
Issue 3, 505–765
Issue 2, 253–503
Issue 1, 1–252

Volume 10, 10 issues

Volume 9, 10 issues

Volume 8, 10 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 8 issues

Volume 5, 8 issues

Volume 4, 8 issues

Volume 3, 8 issues

Volume 2, 8 issues

Volume 1, 4 issues

The Journal
About the Journal
Subscriptions
Editorial Board
Editors' Addresses
Editors' Interests
Scientific Advantages
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Editorial Login
Contacts
Author Index
To Appear
 
ISSN: 1944-7833 (e-only)
ISSN: 1937-0652 (print)
The role of defect and splitting in finite generation of extensions of associated graded rings along a valuation

Steven Dale Cutkosky

Vol. 11 (2017), No. 6, 1461–1488
Abstract

Suppose that R is a 2-dimensional excellent local domain with quotient field K, K is a finite separable extension of K and S is a 2-dimensional local domain with quotient field K such that S dominates R. Suppose that ν is a valuation of K such that ν dominates S. Let ν be the restriction of ν to K. The associated graded ring grν(R) was introduced by Bernard Teissier. It plays an important role in local uniformization. We show that the extension (K,ν) (K,ν) of valued fields is without defect if and only if there exist regular local rings R1 and S1 such that R1 is a local ring of a blowup of R, S1 is a local ring of a blowup of S, ν dominates S1, S1 dominates R1 and the associated graded ring grν(S1) is a finitely generated grν(R1)-algebra.

We also investigate the role of splitting of the valuation ν in K in finite generation of the extensions of associated graded rings along the valuation. We say that ν does not split in S if ν is the unique extension of ν to K which dominates S. We show that if R and S are regular local rings, ν has rational rank  1 and is not discrete and grν(S) is a finitely generated grν(R)-algebra, then S is a localization of the integral closure of R in K, the extension (K,ν) (K,ν) is without defect and ν does not split in S. We give examples showing that such a strong statement is not true when ν does not satisfy these assumptions. As a consequence, we deduce that if ν has rational rank 1 and is not discrete and if R R is a nontrivial sequence of quadratic transforms along ν, then grν(R) is not a finitely generated grν(R)-algebra.

Keywords
valuation, local uniformization
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 14B05
Secondary: 11S15, 13B10, 14E22
Milestones
Received: 4 January 2017
Revised: 15 March 2017
Accepted: 17 April 2017
Published: 16 August 2017
Authors
Steven Dale Cutkosky
Department of Mathematics
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO
United States