Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 18
Issue 6, 1039–1219
Issue 5, 847–1038
Issue 4, 631–846
Issue 3, 409–629
Issue 2, 209–408
Issue 1, 1–208

Volume 17, 12 issues

Volume 16, 10 issues

Volume 15, 10 issues

Volume 14, 10 issues

Volume 13, 10 issues

Volume 12, 10 issues

Volume 11, 10 issues

Volume 10, 10 issues

Volume 9, 10 issues

Volume 8, 10 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 8 issues

Volume 5, 8 issues

Volume 4, 8 issues

Volume 3, 8 issues

Volume 2, 8 issues

Volume 1, 4 issues

The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Editors' interests
ISSN: 1944-7833 (e-only)
ISSN: 1937-0652 (print)
Author index
To appear
Other MSP journals
Distinction inside $\mathrm{L}$-packets of $\mathrm{SL}(n)$

U. K. Anandavardhanan and Nadir Matringe

Vol. 17 (2023), No. 1, 45–82

If EF is a quadratic extension p-adic fields, we first prove that the SL n(F)-distinguished representations inside a distinguished unitary L -packet of SL n(E) are precisely those admitting a degenerate Whittaker model with respect to a degenerate character of N(E)N(F). Then we establish a global analogue of this result. For this, let EF be a quadratic extension of number fields, and let π be an SL n(𝔸F)-distinguished square-integrable automorphic representation of SL n(𝔸E). Let (σ,d) be the unique pair associated to π, where σ is a cuspidal representation of GL r(𝔸E) with n = dr. Using an unfolding argument, we prove that an element of the L -packet of π is distinguished with respect to SL n(𝔸F) if and only if it has a degenerate Whittaker model for a degenerate character ψ of type rd := (r,,r) of Nn(𝔸E) which is trivial on Nn(E + 𝔸F), where Nn is the group of unipotent upper triangular matrices of SL n. As a first application, under the assumptions that EF splits at infinity and r is odd, we establish a local–global principle for SL n(𝔸F)-distinction inside the L -packet of π. As a second application we construct examples of distinguished cuspidal automorphic representations π of SL n(𝔸E) such that the period integral vanishes on some canonical realization of π, and of everywhere locally distinguished representations of SL n(𝔸E) such that their L -packets do not contain any distinguished representation.

Galois distinction, Galois periods, $\mathrm{SL}(n)$, unitary representations, automorphic representations
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 11F70
Secondary: 22E50
Received: 2 December 2020
Revised: 2 August 2021
Accepted: 3 January 2022
Published: 24 March 2023
U. K. Anandavardhanan
Department of Mathematics
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Nadir Matringe
Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu-Paris Rive Gauche
Université Paris Cité - Campus des Grands Moulins
Laboratoire Mathématiques et Applications
Université de Poitiers

Open Access made possible by participating institutions via Subscribe to Open.