Vol. 9, No. 8, 2016

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 11
Issue 5, 1083–1342
Issue 4, 813–1081
Issue 3, 555–812
Issue 2, 263–553
Issue 1, 1–261

Volume 10, 8 issues

Volume 9, 8 issues

Volume 8, 8 issues

Volume 7, 8 issues

Volume 6, 8 issues

Volume 5, 5 issues

Volume 4, 5 issues

Volume 3, 4 issues

Volume 2, 3 issues

Volume 1, 3 issues

The Journal
About the Journal
Subscriptions
Editorial Board
Editors’ Interests
Scientific Advantages
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Editorial Login
Contacts
Author Index
To Appear
 
ISSN: 1948-206X (e-only)
ISSN: 2157-5045 (print)
Finite-time blowup for a supercritical defocusing nonlinear wave system

Terence Tao

Vol. 9 (2016), No. 8, 1999–2030
Abstract

We consider the global regularity problem for defocusing nonlinear wave systems

u = (mF)(u)

on Minkowski spacetime 1+d with d’Alembertian := t2 + i=1dxi2, where the field u : 1+d m is vector-valued, and F : m is a smooth potential which is positive and homogeneous of order p + 1 outside of the unit ball for some p > 1. This generalises the scalar defocusing nonlinear wave (NLW) equation, in which m = 1 and F(v) = 1(p + 1)|v|p+1 . It is well known that in the energy-subcritical and energy-critical cases when d 2 or d 3 and p 1 + 4(d 2), one has global existence of smooth solutions from arbitrary smooth initial data u(0),tu(0), at least for dimensions d 7. We study the supercritical case where d = 3 and p > 5. We show that in this case, there exists a smooth potential F for some sufficiently large m (in fact we can take m = 40), positive and homogeneous of order p + 1 outside of the unit ball, and a smooth choice of initial data u(0),tu(0) for which the solution develops a finite-time singularity. In fact the solution is discretely self-similar in a backwards light cone. The basic strategy is to first select the mass and energy densities of u, then u itself, and then finally design the potential F in order to solve the required equation. The Nash embedding theorem is used in the second step, explaining the need to take m relatively large.

Keywords
nonlinear wave equation, Nash embedding theorem
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 35Q30, 35L71
Secondary: 35L67
Milestones
Received: 24 February 2016
Revised: 6 August 2016
Accepted: 29 September 2016
Published: 11 December 2016
Authors
Terence Tao
Department of Mathematics
UCLA
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555
United States