Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Volume 18, Issue 1
Volume 17, Issue 1
Volume 16, Issue 2
Volume 16, Issue 1
Volume 15, Issue 2
Volume 15, Issue 1
Volume 14, Issue 2
Volume 14, Issue 1
Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 1
Volume 12, Issue 1
Volume 11, Issue 2
Volume 11, Issue 1
Volume 10, Issue 2
Volume 10, Issue 1
Volume 9, Issue 2
Volume 9, Issue 1
Volume 8, Issue 1
Volume 7, Issue 2
Volume 7, Issue 1
Volume 6, Issue 1
Volume 5, Issue 2
Volume 5, Issue 1
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1
The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Policies for Authors
Ethics Statement
ISSN: 2157-5452 (e-only)
ISSN: 1559-3940 (print)
Author Index
To Appear
Other MSP Journals
An immersed boundary method for rigid bodies

Bakytzhan Kallemov, Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla, Boyce E. Griffith and Aleksandar Donev

Vol. 11 (2016), No. 1, 79–141

We develop an immersed boundary (IB) method for modeling flows around fixed or moving rigid bodies that is suitable for a broad range of Reynolds numbers, including steady Stokes flow. The spatio-temporal discretization of the fluid equations is based on a standard staggered-grid approach. Fluid-body interaction is handled using Peskin’s IB method; however, unlike existing IB approaches to such problems, we do not rely on penalty or fractional-step formulations. Instead, we use an unsplit scheme that ensures the no-slip constraint is enforced exactly in terms of the Lagrangian velocity field evaluated at the IB markers. Fractional-step approaches, by contrast, can impose such constraints only approximately, which can lead to penetration of the flow into the body, and are inconsistent for steady Stokes flow. Imposing no-slip constraints exactly requires the solution of a large linear system that includes the fluid velocity and pressure as well as Lagrange multiplier forces that impose the motion of the body. The principal contribution of this paper is that it develops an efficient preconditioner for this exactly constrained IB formulation which is based on an analytical approximation to the Schur complement. This approach is enabled by the near translational and rotational invariance of Peskin’s IB method. We demonstrate that only a few cycles of a geometric multigrid method for the fluid equations are required in each application of the preconditioner, and we demonstrate robust convergence of the overall Krylov solver despite the approximations made in the preconditioner. We empirically observe that to control the condition number of the coupled linear system while also keeping the rigid structure impermeable to fluid, we need to place the immersed boundary markers at a distance of about two grid spacings, which is significantly larger from what has been recommended in the literature for elastic bodies. We demonstrate the advantage of our monolithic solver over split solvers by computing the steady state flow through a two-dimensional nozzle at several Reynolds numbers. We apply the method to a number of benchmark problems at zero and finite Reynolds numbers, and we demonstrate first-order convergence of the method to several analytical solutions and benchmark computations.

immersed boundary method, rigid body, fluid-structure interaction
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 65N22, 65N55, 76D07
Received: 16 June 2015
Revised: 23 November 2015
Accepted: 5 January 2016
Published: 29 February 2016
Bakytzhan Kallemov
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
New York University
New York, NY 10012
United States
Amneet Pal Singh Bhalla
Department of Mathematics
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States
Boyce E. Griffith
Departments of Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States
Aleksandar Donev
Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
New York University
New York, NY 10012
United States