Download this article
 Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Volume 20, Issue 1
Volume 19, Issue 1
Volume 18, Issue 1
Volume 17, Issue 1
Volume 16, Issue 2
Volume 16, Issue 1
Volume 15, Issue 2
Volume 15, Issue 1
Volume 14, Issue 2
Volume 14, Issue 1
Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 1
Volume 12, Issue 1
Volume 11, Issue 2
Volume 11, Issue 1
Volume 10, Issue 2
Volume 10, Issue 1
Volume 9, Issue 2
Volume 9, Issue 1
Volume 8, Issue 1
Volume 7, Issue 2
Volume 7, Issue 1
Volume 6, Issue 1
Volume 5, Issue 2
Volume 5, Issue 1
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 2157-5452 (electronic)
ISSN 1559-3940 (print)
 
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
A comparative study of efficient multigrid solvers for high-order local discontinuous Galerkin methods: Poisson, elliptic interface, and multiphase Stokes problems

Robert I. Saye

Vol. 20 (2025), No. 1, 253–291
Abstract

We design and investigate a variety of multigrid solvers for high-order local discontinuous Galerkin methods applied to elliptic interface and multiphase Stokes problems. Using the template of a standard multigrid V-cycle, we consider a variety of element-wise block smoothers, including Jacobi, multicoloured Gauss–Seidel, processor-block Gauss–Seidel, and with special interest, smoothers based on sparse approximate inverse (SAI) methods. In particular, we develop SAI methods that: (i) balance the smoothing of velocity and pressure variables in Stokes problems; and (ii) robustly handles high-contrast viscosity coefficients in multiphase problems. Across a broad range of two- and three-dimensional test cases, including Poisson, elliptic interface, steady-state Stokes, and unsteady Stokes problems, we examine a multitude of multigrid smoother and solver combinations. In every case, there is at least one approach that matches the performance of classical geometric multigrid algorithms, e.g., 4 to 8 iterations reduce the residual by 10 orders of magnitude. We also discuss their relative merits with regard to simplicity, robustness, computational cost, and parallelisation.

Keywords
multigrid, local discontinuous Galerkin, elliptic interface, Stokes, multiphase, sparse approximate inverse, Gauss–Seidel
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 65N55
Secondary: 65N30, 65N22, 76D07, 35J57
Milestones
Received: 9 December 2024
Revised: 18 June 2025
Accepted: 4 September 2025
Published: 26 September 2025
Authors
Robert I. Saye
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States