Volume 16 (2009)

Download this article
For screen
For printing
Recent Volumes
Volume 1, 1998
Volume 2, 1999
Volume 3, 2000
Volume 4, 2002
Volume 5, 2002
Volume 6, 2003
Volume 7, 2004
Volume 8, 2006
Volume 9, 2006
Volume 10, 2007
Volume 11, 2007
Volume 12, 2007
Volume 13, 2008
Volume 14, 2008
Volume 15, 2008
Volume 16, 2009
Volume 17, 2011
Volume 18, 2012
Volume 19, 2015
The Series
MSP Books and Monographs
About this Series
Editorial Board
Ethics Statement
Author Index
Submission Guidelines
Author Copyright Form
Purchases
ISSN (electronic): 1464-8997
ISSN (print): 1464-8989
Other MSP Publications

What are E ring spaces good for?

J P May

Geometry & Topology Monographs 16 (2009) 331–365

DOI: 10.2140/gtm.2009.16.331

arXiv: 0903.2819

Abstract

Infinite loop space theory, both additive and multiplicative, arose largely from two basic motivations. One was to solve calculational questions in geometric topology. The other was to better understand algebraic K–theory. The Adams conjecture is intrinsic to the first motivation, and Quillen’s proof of that led directly to his original, calculationally accessible, definition of algebraic K–theory. In turn, the infinite loop understanding of algebraic K–theory feeds back into the calculational questions in geometric topology. For example, use of infinite loop space theory leads to a method for determining the characteristic classes for topological bundles (at odd primes) in terms of the cohomology of finite groups. We explain just a little about how all that works, focusing on the central role played by E ring spaces.

Keywords

algebraic K–theory spectrum, bipermutative category, classifying space, E ring space, E ring spectrum, orientation theory, Thom spectrum

Mathematical Subject Classification

Primary: 55P42, 55P43

Secondary: 18D50

References
Publication

Received: 14 September 2008
Accepted: 3 February 2009
Published: 2 July 2009

Authors
J P May
Department of Mathematics
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois 60637
USA
http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may