|
|||||
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair choice
sequences
William J. Keith and Sean Grindatti
Vol. 12 (2019), No. 1, 13–30
|
Abstract |
|
We consider turn sequences used to allocate of a set of indivisible items between two players who take turns choosing their most desired element of the set, with the goal of minimizing the advantage of the first player. Balanced alternation, while not usually optimal, is fairer than alternation. Strategies for seeking the fairest choice sequence are discussed. We show an unexpected combinatorial connection between partition dominance and fairness, suggesting a new avenue for future investigations in this subject, and conjecture a connection to a previously studied optimality criterion. Several intriguing questions are open at multiple levels of accessibility. |
PDF Access Denied
We have not been able to recognize your IP address
35.173.48.18
as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by
subscription, or purchase of single articles.
Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our journal-recommendation form. Or, visit our subscription page for instructions on purchasing a subscription.
You may also contact us at
contact@msp.org
or by using our
contact form.
Or, you may purchase this single article for USD 30.00:
Keywords
social choice, fair division, permutations, fairness,
egalitarian, partitions, dominance
|
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 91A05
Secondary: 05A17
|
Milestones
Received: 8 July 2016
Revised: 10 December 2017
Accepted: 30 December 2017
Published: 31 May 2018
Communicated by Kenneth S. Berenhaut
|
Authors |
| William J. Keith | |
| Department of Mathematical
Sciences Michigan Tech University Houghton, MI United States |
|
| Sean Grindatti | |
| Department of Mathematical
Sciences Michigan Tech University Houghton, MI United States |
|
