Download this article
 Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 17
Issue 5, 723–899
Issue 4, 543–722
Issue 3, 363–541
Issue 2, 183–362
Issue 1, 1–182

Volume 16, 5 issues

Volume 15, 5 issues

Volume 14, 5 issues

Volume 13, 5 issues

Volume 12, 8 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 5 issues

Volume 9, 5 issues

Volume 8, 5 issues

Volume 7, 6 issues

Volume 6, 4 issues

Volume 5, 4 issues

Volume 4, 4 issues

Volume 3, 4 issues

Volume 2, 5 issues

Volume 1, 2 issues

The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Editors' interests
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1944-4184 (online)
ISSN 1944-4176 (print)
 
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
An issue of guaranteed representation in a variant of Hamilton's method

Graham Chambers-Wall and David McCune

Vol. 17 (2024), No. 3, 373–396
Abstract

The Arkansas Republican party invented an apportionment method for their 2016 presidential primary that is a variant of the classical apportionment method Hamilton’s method. We provide a formula for the probability that these two methods produce the same apportionment in three-candidate elections, assuming all election outcomes are equally likely. We also prove that the method invented by Arkansas Republicans is more favorable to lower-ranked candidates than Hamilton’s method.

Keywords
apportionment, Hamilton's method, presidential primaries
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 91B10
Secondary: 91B14
Milestones
Received: 18 June 2021
Revised: 2 April 2022
Accepted: 27 February 2023
Published: 17 July 2024

Communicated by Kenneth S. Berenhaut
Authors
Graham Chambers-Wall
William Jewell College
Liberty, MO
United States
David McCune
Department of Mathematics and Data Science
William Jewell College
Liberty, MO
United States