[an error occurred while processing this directive]
The kinematic and static
problems of limit analysis of no-tension bodies are formulated. The kinematic
problem involves the infimum of kinematically admissible multipliers, and the static
problem the supremum of statically admissible multipliers. The central question of
the paper is under which conditions these two numbers coincide. This involves
choices of function spaces for the competitor displacements and competitor
stresses. A whole ordered scale of these spaces is presented. These problems are
formulated as convex variational problems considered by Ekeland and Témam.
The static problem is unconditionally shown to be the dual problem (in the
sense of the mentioned reference) of the kinematic problem. A necessary andsufficient condition, the normality, guarantees that the kinematic and static
problems give the same result. The normality is not always satisfied, as
examples show (one of which is presented here). The qualification hypothesis of
Ekeland and Témam, sufficient for the equality of the static and kinematic
problems, is never satisfied in the spaces of admissible displacements of bounded
deformation or of functions integrable together with the gradient in the power
p,1 ≤ p < ∞. In the cases of lipschitzian displacements and of smooth
displacements, the qualification hypothesis is equivalent to simple conditions
that can be satisfied in the case of the pure traction problem. However,
it is shown that then the space of admissible stresses must be enlarged to
contain stress fields represented by finitely or countably additive tensor-valued
measures.
Keywords
limit analysis, static and kinematic theorems, duality of
displacements and forces