Vol. 14, No. 5, 2019

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 19
Issue 5, 747–835
Issue 4, 541–746
Issue 3, 303–540
Issue 2, 157–302
Issue 1, 1–156

Volume 18, 5 issues

Volume 17, 5 issues

Volume 16, 5 issues

Volume 15, 5 issues

Volume 14, 5 issues

Volume 13, 5 issues

Volume 12, 5 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 5 issues

Volume 9, 5 issues

Volume 8, 8 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 9 issues

Volume 5, 6 issues

Volume 4, 10 issues

Volume 3, 10 issues

Volume 2, 10 issues

Volume 1, 8 issues

The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1559-3959 (online)
ISSN 1559-3959 (print)
 
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
This article is available for purchase or by subscription. See below.
Automatic generation of statically admissible stress fields in masonry vaults

Elena De Chiara, Claudia Cennamo, Antonio Gesualdo, Andrea Montanino, Carlo Olivieri and Antonio Fortunato

Vol. 14 (2019), No. 5, 719–737
Abstract

The objective of the present work is to develop an automated numerical method for the analysis of thin masonry shells. The material model for masonry that we adopt is the so-called “normal rigid no-tension” (NRNT) material; and for such a material, the kinematical and the safe theorems of limit analysis are valid. The present study focuses on the application of the second theorem to masonry vaults and domes, being devoted to the determination of a class of purely compressive stress regimes, which are balanced with the load. The mere existence of such a class is a proof that the structure is safe, and members of this class may be used to assess the geometric degree of safety of the structure and to estimate bounds on the thrust forces exerted by the structure on its boundary. The problem is reduced to the equilibrium of a membrane S and can be formulated in terms of projected stresses defined on the planform Ω of S. The search of the stress reduces to the solution of a second-order pde, in terms of the stress potential F. In order that the membrane stress on S be compressive, the potential F must be concave. As for the thrust line in an arch, the surface S is not fixed and may be changed, given that it remains inside the masonry. Under these simplifying assumptions, the whole class of equilibrated stress regimes for a masonry shell is obtained by moving and deforming S inside the masonry, and also, for any fixed shape, by changing the boundary data for F, that is the distribution of thrust forces along the boundary. The search for a feasible stress state on a convenient membrane surface, to be chosen with a trial and error procedure, requires a substantial effort and may be unrewarded. Then, the main object of the present work, is to produce a computer code that can handle numerically the interplay of the shape controlled by a function f, and of the stress potential F, by developing a convergent optimization scheme able to give a safe state under the given material and geometrical constraints, namely the concavity of F and the inclusion of f within the masonry. Two simple cases, are exposed in detail to illustrate the method.

PDF Access Denied

We have not been able to recognize your IP address 18.97.14.81 as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by subscription, or purchase of single articles.

Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our journal-recom­mendation form. Or, visit our subscription page for instructions on purchasing a subscription.

You may also contact us at contact@msp.org
or by using our contact form.

Or, you may purchase this single article for USD 45.00:

Keywords
masonry vaults, no-tension materials, Airy's stress function, Pucher equilibrium
Milestones
Received: 24 March 2019
Revised: 3 October 2019
Accepted: 18 October 2019
Published: 31 December 2019
Authors
Elena De Chiara
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Salerno
Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132
84084 Fisciano
Italy
Claudia Cennamo
Department of Architecture and Industrial Design
University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”
81031 Aversa
Italy
Antonio Gesualdo
Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture
University of Naples Federico II
Via Claudio 21 (buildings 6-7)
80125 Naples
Italy
Andrea Montanino
Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture
University of Naples Federico II
Via Claudio 21 (buildings 6-7)
80125 Naples
Italy
Carlo Olivieri
Department of Civil Engineering
University of Salerno
Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132
84084 Fisciano
Italy
Antonio Fortunato
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile
University of Salerno
Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132
84084 Fisciano
Italy