Vol. 16, No. 2, 2021

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 19
Issue 4, 541–649
Issue 4, 541–572
Issue 3, 303–540
Issue 2, 157–302
Issue 1, 1–156

Volume 18, 5 issues

Volume 17, 5 issues

Volume 16, 5 issues

Volume 15, 5 issues

Volume 14, 5 issues

Volume 13, 5 issues

Volume 12, 5 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 5 issues

Volume 9, 5 issues

Volume 8, 8 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 9 issues

Volume 5, 6 issues

Volume 4, 10 issues

Volume 3, 10 issues

Volume 2, 10 issues

Volume 1, 8 issues

The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
ISSN (electronic): 1559-3959
ISSN (print): 1559-3959
Author index
To appear
Other MSP journals
A new meshless Fragile Points Method (FPM) with minimum unknowns at each point, for flexoelectric analysis under two theories with crack propagation, I: Theory and implementation

Yue Guan, Leiting Dong and Satya N. Atluri

Vol. 16 (2021), No. 2, 159–195

“Flexoelectricity” refers to a phenomenon which involves a coupling of the mechanical strain gradient and electric polarization. In this study, a meshless Fragile Points Method (FPM) is presented for analyzing flexoelectric effects in dielectric solids. Local, simple, polynomial and discontinuous trial and test functions are generated with the help of a local meshless Differential Quadrature approximation of derivatives. Both primal and mixed FPM are developed, based on two alternate flexoelectric theories, with or without the electric gradient effect and Maxwell stress. The first theory is fully nonlinear and is recommended at the nanoscale, while the second theory is linear and is sufficient at the microscale. In the present primal as well as mixed FPM, only the displacements and electric potential are retained as explicit unknown variables at each internal Fragile Point in the final algebraic equations. Thus the number of unknowns in the final system of algebraic equations is kept to be absolutely minimal. An algorithm for simulating crack initiation and propagation using the present FPM is presented, with classic stress-based criterion as well as a bonding-energy-rate (BER)-based criterion for crack development. The present primal and mixed FPM approaches represent clear advantages as compared to the current methods for computational flexoelectric analyses, using primal as well as mixed Finite Element Methods, Element Free Galerkin (EFG) Methods, Meshless Local Petrov Galerkin (MLPG) Methods, and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA) Methods, because of the following new features: they are simpler Galerkin meshless methods using polynomial trial and test functions; minimal DoFs per Point make it very user-friendly; arbitrary polygonal subdomains make it flexible for modeling complex geometries; the numerical integration of the primal as well as mixed FPM weak forms is trivially simple; and FPM can be easily employed in crack development simulations without remeshing or trial function enhancement. In this first part of the two-part series, we focus on the theoretical formulation and implementation of the proposed primal as well as mixed FPM. Numerical results and validation are then presented in Part II of the present paper.

flexoelectricity, strain gradient effect, fragile points method (FPM), crack propagation
Received: 27 September 2020
Accepted: 22 January 2021
Published: 6 June 2021
Yue Guan
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Texas Tech University
Lubbock, TX
United States
Leiting Dong
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering
Beihang University
Satya N. Atluri
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Texas Tech University
Lubbock, TX
United States