Vol. 16, No. 5, 2021

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues

Volume 19
Issue 5, 747–835
Issue 4, 541–746
Issue 3, 303–540
Issue 2, 157–302
Issue 1, 1–156

Volume 18, 5 issues

Volume 17, 5 issues

Volume 16, 5 issues

Volume 15, 5 issues

Volume 14, 5 issues

Volume 13, 5 issues

Volume 12, 5 issues

Volume 11, 5 issues

Volume 10, 5 issues

Volume 9, 5 issues

Volume 8, 8 issues

Volume 7, 10 issues

Volume 6, 9 issues

Volume 5, 6 issues

Volume 4, 10 issues

Volume 3, 10 issues

Volume 2, 10 issues

Volume 1, 8 issues

The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1559-3959 (online)
ISSN 1559-3959 (print)
 
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Numerical simulation of frozen soil under uniaxial and coupled dynamic-static impact loads

Zhanfan Chunyu, Zhiwu Zhu, Weiran Tang, Fulai Zhang and Tiantian Fu

Vol. 16 (2021), No. 5, 677–696
DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2021.16.677
Abstract

The split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment, wherein frozen soil is subjected to uniaxial and coupled dynamic-static impact loads, was simulated numerically. The results revealed that frozen soil exhibited strain rate and temperature effects under uniaxial impact load only. When the frozen soil specimen under an initial quasistatic load (axial pressure or confining pressure) was subjected to an axial impact load, the stress-strain curve of the specimen was obtained. The initial axial and confining pressures, which had identical values and were applied to the specimen simultaneously, are referred to as the combined load in this paper. When the specimen under combined load was subjected to an axial impact load, its peak stress values exhibited varying trends for different value ranges of the combined load. Finally, the destruction of the frozen soil specimen varied significantly with the increase in axial pressure, confining pressure, and combined load.

Keywords
numerical simulation, impact analysis, axial pressure, confining pressure, combined load
Milestones
Received: 9 April 2021
Revised: 30 July 2021
Accepted: 5 August 2021
Published: 31 August 2022
Authors
Zhanfan Chunyu
Southwest Jiaotong University
Chengdu, Sichuan
China
Zhiwu Zhu
Southwest Jiaotong University
Chengdu, Sichuan
China
Weiran Tang
Southwest Jiaotong University
Chengdu, Sichuan
China
Fulai Zhang
Southwest Jiaotong University
Chengdu, Sichuan
China
Tiantian Fu
Southwest Jiaotong University
Chengdu, Sichuan
China