This work brings together two viewpoints on the mechanics of bulk growth that, in
spite of some similarities, originate from different conceptualizations of this
phenomenon. Each viewpoint designates a specific approach to growth, identified
by the “growth law” that it determines, i.e., the “rule” governing the mass
variation in the considered growing medium. In the first approach, which we call
the “a priori approach”, the growth law is supplied phenomenologically, is
viewed as a constraint, and is appended to the principle of virtual work in
order to determine the effective dynamic equations of the growth problem
at hand. On the other hand, in the second approach, denominated the “a
posteriori approach”, growth is regarded as an unconstrained problem, and the
growth law is viewed as a consequence of the medium’s dynamics. To highlight
the main differences between these two approaches, we solve numerically a
simple benchmark problem, and we compare the simulations obtained for each
approach.
Keywords
growth phenomenology, principle of virtual work, benchmark
tests