Vol. 15, No. 3, 1965

Download this article
Download this article. For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 344: 1  2
Vol. 343: 1  2
Vol. 342: 1  2
Vol. 341: 1  2
Vol. 340: 1  2
Vol. 339: 1  2
Vol. 338: 1  2
Vol. 337: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Classes of recursive functions based on Ackermann’s function

Robert Wells Ritchie

Vol. 15 (1965), No. 3, 1027–1044
Abstract

Grzegorczyk has defined an increasing sequence of classes ℰn of functions with the properties that ℰ3 is the class of elementary functions of Csillag-Kalmar and ∪ℰn is the class of primitive recursive functions. Further, ℰn+1 properly contains ℰn, if n > 2 then ℰn+1 contains a “universal function” over all one-argument functions in ℰn, and a sequence of functions gn(x,y) in terms of which the ℰn are defined has the property that each gn+1(x,x) (eventually) majorizes all the one-argument functions in ℰn.

The functions gn(x,y) are defined by somewhat artificial nested recursions, and Grzegorczyk poses the following question: “Can the same theorems be proved for classes ℱn as for the classes ℰn?” Here ℱn differs from ℰn only in substituting a more natural function fn′(x,y) for each gn(x,y) in the definition of the class. In this paper, we answer his question affirmatively. Indeed, we prove that ℱn = ℰn for all n ≧ 0, and further, fn+1′(x,x) eventually majorizes all the one-argument functions in ℱn.

Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 02.70
Milestones
Received: 25 January 1964
Published: 1 September 1965
Authors
Robert Wells Ritchie