Vol. 15, No. 4, 1965

Download this article
Download this article. For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 344: 1  2
Vol. 343: 1  2
Vol. 342: 1  2
Vol. 341: 1  2
Vol. 340: 1  2
Vol. 339: 1  2
Vol. 338: 1  2
Vol. 337: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Group extension representations and the structure space

Robert James Blattner

Vol. 15 (1965), No. 4, 1101–1113
Abstract

Let K be a locally compact group. K∗ will denote the Jacobson structure space of C∗(K), the group C∗-algebra of K. For any unitary representation V of K on a Hilbert space, let EV denote the projection valued measure on the Borel sets of K∗ defined by Glimm (Pacific J. Math. 12 (1962), 885–911; Theorem 1.9). A (not necessarily BoreI) subset S of K∗ is called EV -thick if EV (S1) = 0 for every Borel S1 ⊆ K∗∼ S. For any two representations V 1 and V 2, ℛ(V 1,V 2) will denote the space of operators intertwining V 1 and V 2.

Suppose K is a closed normal subgroup of the locally compact group G. If V is a representation of K and x ∈ G, V x is defined by V kx = V xkx−1, k ∈ K. If z ∈ K∗, zx = Ker(V x), where V is any irreducible repesentation such that z = Ker(V ). (By Ker we mean the kernel in the group C∗-algebra.) This composition turns (K∗,G) into a topological transformation group (Glimm, op. cit., Lemma 1.3). The present paper first shows that the stability subgroups of G at points z ∈ K∗ are closed. Then the following two theorems are proved:

Theorem 1. Let z ∈ K∗ and let H be the stability subgroup of G at z. Let L be a representation of H such that {z} is EL|K-thick. Then ℛ(UL,UL) is isomorphic to ℛ(L,L) and {z}G is EUL|K-thick.

Theorem 2. Let M be a representation of G such that {z}G is EM|K-thick for some z ∈ K∗. Let H be the stability subgroup of G at z. Suppose G∕H is σ-compact. Then there is a representation L of H such that {z} is EL|K-thick and such that M ≃ UL.

In the above, UL denotes the representation of G induced by L.

It is shown further that if C∗(K)|z contains an ideal isomorphic to the algebra of all compact operators on some Hilbert space, then the representation L|K of these theorems is a multiple of the (essentially unique) irreducible representation L0 of K such that Ker(L0) = z. Finally, it is shown that if M is primary and if K∗∕G is almost Hausdorff (i.e., every nonvoid closed subset contains a nonvoid relatively open Hausdorff subset), then M satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 2.

Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 22.60
Milestones
Received: 30 September 1964
Published: 1 December 1965
Authors
Robert James Blattner