Vol. 17, No. 2, 1966

Download this article
Download this article. For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 332: 1  2
Vol. 331: 1  2
Vol. 330: 1  2
Vol. 329: 1  2
Vol. 328: 1  2
Vol. 327: 1  2
Vol. 326: 1  2
Vol. 325: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Sufficient conditions for an optimal control problem in the calculus of variations

Edwin Haena Mookini

Vol. 17 (1966), No. 2, 263–277
Abstract

An arc C is a collection of parameters bρ (ρ = 1,,r) on an open set B and sets of functions yi(x), ah(x)(i = 1,,n;h = 1,,m) defined on an interval x1 x x2 with yi(x) continuous and i(x), ah(x) piecewise continuous. The arc is admissible if it satisfies the differential equations

˙yi = Pi(x,y,a) (i = 1,⋅⋅⋅ ,n)

on x1 x x2 and the end conditions

xs = Xs(b),yi(xs) = Yis(b) (s = 1,2).

The dot denotes differentiation with respect to x. The problem at hand is to find in a class of admissible arcs C, an arc C0, which minimizes the integral

            ∫ x2
I(C ) = g(b)+    f(x,y,a)dx
x1

where P(x,y,a) and f(x,y,a) are assumed to be class C′′ for (x,y,a) in an open set R while g(b), Xs(b), Y is(b) are of class C′′ on B. Under the added assumption that P(x,y,a) is Lipschitzian in y and a, the indirect method of Hestenes is used to prove that the necessary conditions for relative minima of the problem above, strengthened in the usual manner, yield a set of sufficient conditions. This problem differs from that of Pontryagin in the choice of (x,y,a) to lie in an open set.

Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 93.40
Secondary: 49.00
Milestones
Received: 11 November 1964
Published: 1 May 1966
Authors
Edwin Haena Mookini