Vol. 27, No. 3, 1968

Download this article
Download this article. For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 332: 1  2
Vol. 331: 1  2
Vol. 330: 1  2
Vol. 329: 1  2
Vol. 328: 1  2
Vol. 327: 1  2
Vol. 326: 1  2
Vol. 325: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Pick’s conditions and analyticity

Alan Carleton Hindmarsh

Vol. 27 (1968), No. 3, 527–531
Abstract

Let w(z) be a function in the open upper half plane (UHP) with values in UHP, and let Pn = (dij) be the n × n matrix of difference quotients

            -----
w-(zi)−-w-(zj)
dij =   zi − zj

formed from any n points z1,z2,,zn UHP. It was shown by G. Pick that if w(z) is also analytic in UHP, then the Pn are all nonnegative definite Hermitian matrices (denoted Pn 0). In what follows, two converse results are derived.

(1) If D is a domain in UHP, w(z) is continuous in D and has values in UHP, and P3 0 for all choices of the z1,z2,z3 D, then w(z) is analytic in D. It is well known that the condition P2 0 does not imply anything of this sort, but corresponds only to a distance-shrinking property of w(z) in the noneuclidean geometry of UHP.

(2) If w is as before, but Pn 0 for all n and all z1,,zn D, i.e., {w(z) w(ζ)}(z ζ) is a nonnegative definite kernel in D, then w(z) is analytic in D and has an analytic extension to UHP whose values are in UHP.

Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 30.28
Milestones
Received: 6 March 1968
Published: 1 December 1968
Authors
Alan Carleton Hindmarsh