Vol. 49, No. 2, 1973

Download this article
Download this article. For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 294: 1
Vol. 293: 1  2
Vol. 292: 1  2
Vol. 291: 1  2
Vol. 290: 1  2
Vol. 289: 1  2
Vol. 288: 1  2
Vol. 287: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
Subscriptions
Editorial Board
Officers
Special Issues
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Contacts
Author Index
To Appear
 
ISSN: 0030-8730
Slender rings and modules

Everett Lee Lady

Vol. 49 (1973), No. 2, 397–406
Abstract

An abelian group B is called slender if every homomorphism from 1Z into B is continuous for the discrete topology on B and the topology that 1Z has as a cartesian product if Z (the additive group of integers) is considered discrete. It can be seen that if B is slender, then every homomorphism from 1Ai into B is continuous for the same topologies, where Ai are arbitrary abelian groups. Slender groups were completely characterized by Nunke, and it follows from his characterization that all countable reduced torsion free groups are slender. Nunke’s results depend on the fact that Z is slender (proved by Specker) and the use of some homological machinery. In this paper, slender modules are studied over an arbitrary ring. A ring R will be called slender if R is a slender R-module. In Theorem 1, a generalization of the Baire Category Theorem is used to show that a countable module over an arbitrary ring is slender if mB = 0, where m ranges over the set of ideals in R which are not zero divisors for B. It follows that countable torsion free reduced modules over any (countable) integral domain are slender. In Theorem 2, it is shown that a commutative ring R is slender if there exists an infinite set of maximal ideals with the property that the intersection of any infinite subset is 0.

In §2, reflexive modules over a slender ring are studied, and it is shown that a projective module is reflexive if it is generated by a set with cardinality smaller than the first measurable cardinal. In §3, Nunke’s characterization is extended to modules over a slender Dedekind domain having only countably many ideals. The general approach in §3 follows Nunke’s, but all homological machinery is avoided by the use of topological techniques.

Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 16A64
Milestones
Received: 23 March 1972
Published: 1 December 1973
Authors
Everett Lee Lady