1. Let l = k1 ∪ k2 be a
2-component link in S3, with k2 unknotted. The 2-fold cover of S3 branched over k2
is again S3; let k1(2) be the inverse image of k1, and suppose that k1(2)
is connected. How are the signatures σ(k1), σ(k1(2)) of the knots k1 and
k1(2) related? This question was considered (from a slightly different point
of view) by Murasugi, who gave the following answer [Topology, 9 (1970),
283-298].
Theorem 1 (Murasugi).
Recall [4] that the invariant ξ(l) is defined by first orienting l, giving, an oriented
link l, say, and then setting ξ(l) = σ(l) + Lk(k1,k2), where σ denotes signature and
Lk linking number.
In the present note we shall give an alternative, more conceptual, proof of
Theorem 1, and in fact obtain it as a special case of a considerably more general
result.
|