Vol. 92, No. 1, 1981

Recent Issues
Vol. 344: 1  2
Vol. 343: 1  2
Vol. 342: 1  2
Vol. 341: 1  2
Vol. 340: 1  2
Vol. 339: 1  2
Vol. 338: 1  2
Vol. 337: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Holomorphy on spaces of distribution

Philip J. Boland and Sean Dineen

Vol. 92 (1981), No. 1, 27–34
Abstract

If E is a locally convex space and U ⊂ E is open, then H(U) is the space of holomorphic functions on U (i.e., H(U) = {f : U → C, f G-analytic and continuous}). τ0 is the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets of U. τω is the Nachbin ported topology defined by all semi-norms on H(U) ported by compact subsets of U. (A semi-norm p on H(U) is ported by K if whenever V is open and K ⊂ V ⊂ U, there exists CV such that p(f) ≤ CV |f|V for all f ∈ H(U).) τδ is the topology defined by all semi-norms p on H(U) with the following property: if (Un) is a countable increasing open cover of U, there exist C > 0 and UN such that p(f) ≦ C|f|UN for all f ∈ H(U). HHY (U) is the space of hypoanalytic functions on U — that is HHY (U) = {f : f is G -analytic and the restriction of f to any compact set  K ⊂ U is continuous}.

If Ω is open in Rn, then 𝒟(Ω) and 𝒟′(Ω) are respectively the Schwartz space of test functions and the Schwartz space of distributions on Ω. We prove that H(𝒟(Ω))≠HHY (𝒟(Ω)) and that τ0 = τω = τδ on H(𝒟(Ω)) while HHY (𝒟′(Ω)) = H(𝒟′(Ω)) but τ0≠τω≠τδ on H(𝒟′(Ω)).

Mathematical Subject Classification 2000
Primary: 46G20
Secondary: 30H05, 32A07, 46F99
Milestones
Received: 18 April 1979
Revised: 6 December 1979
Published: 1 January 1981
Authors
Philip J. Boland
Sean Dineen