First, in a concrete category,
an HS’P-cIass (of objects) is one closed under P: products, S’: some kind
of subobjects, H: surjective images. Next, given a class E of morphisms,
the object class of “injectives for E” is defined: A ∈ inj E means ∀e ∈ E,
∀φ ∈ Hom(domain(e),A), ∃φ ∈ Hom(codomain(e),A) with φe = φ. Then, the
“description” of the title is, in a concrete category with enough free objects, and
well-behaved in other ways: the HS’P-classes are exactly the classes of the form
inj E, for just those E which have domain(e) free for each e ∈ E (with the
meaning of S′ and the nature of the maps in E depending on each other). This
includes a version of Birkhoff’s Variety Theorem, but more to the present
point, is interpreted easily in various specific settings from topology, algebra,
and abstract analysis to provide quite concrete descriptions of HSP-like
classes.
|