Vol. 206, No. 2, 2002

Download this article
Download this article. For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 332: 1  2
Vol. 331: 1  2
Vol. 330: 1  2
Vol. 329: 1  2
Vol. 328: 1  2
Vol. 327: 1  2
Vol. 326: 1  2
Vol. 325: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
On distinguishedness

U.K. Anandavardhanan and R. Tandon

Vol. 206 (2002), No. 2, 269–286
Abstract

Let F be a finite extension of Qp and K a quadratic extension of F. If ,V ) is a representation of GL2(K), H a subgroup of GL2(K) and μ a character of the image subgroup det(H) of K, then Π is said to be μ-distinguished with respect to H if there exists a nonzero linear form l on V such that l(Π(g)v) = μ(detg)l(v) for g H and v V . We provide new proofs, using entirely local methods, of some well-known results in the theory of non-archimedean distinguished representations for GL(2).

Milestones
Received: 11 January 2001
Revised: 28 November 2001
Published: 1 October 2002
Authors
U.K. Anandavardhanan
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
School of MCIS
University of Hyderabad
Hyderabad-500046
India
R. Tandon
Department of Mathematics and Statistics
School of MCIS
University of Hyderabad
Hyderabad-500046
India