Vol. 278, No. 1, 2015

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Vol. 332: 1  2
Vol. 331: 1  2
Vol. 330: 1  2
Vol. 329: 1  2
Vol. 328: 1  2
Vol. 327: 1  2
Vol. 326: 1  2
Vol. 325: 1  2
Online Archive
Volume:
Issue:
     
The Journal
About the journal
Ethics and policies
Peer-review process
 
Submission guidelines
Submission form
Editorial board
Officers
 
Subscriptions
 
ISSN 1945-5844 (electronic)
ISSN 0030-8730 (print)
 
Special Issues
Author index
To appear
 
Other MSP journals
Growth tight actions

Goulnara N. Arzhantseva, Christopher H. Cashen and Jing Tao

Vol. 278 (2015), No. 1, 1–49
Abstract

We introduce and systematically study the concept of a growth tight action. This generalizes growth tightness for word metrics as initiated by Grigorchuk and de la Harpe. Given a finitely generated, nonelementary group G acting on a G-space X, we prove that if G contains a strongly contracting element and if G is not too badly distorted in X, then the action of G on X is a growth tight action. It follows that if X is a cocompact, relatively hyperbolic G-space, then the action of G on X is a growth tight action. This generalizes all previously known results for growth tightness of cocompact actions: every already known example of a group that admits a growth tight action and has some infinite, infinite index normal subgroups is relatively hyperbolic; conversely, relatively hyperbolic groups admit growth tight actions. This also allows us to prove that many CAT(0) groups, including flip-graph manifold groups and many right angled Artin groups, and snowflake groups admit cocompact, growth tight actions. These provide first examples of non relatively hyperbolic groups admitting interesting growth tight actions. Our main result applies as well to cusp uniform actions on hyperbolic spaces and to the action of the mapping class group on Teichmüller space with the Teichmüller metric. Towards the proof of our main result, we give equivalent characterizations of strongly contracting elements and produce new examples of group actions with strongly contracting elements.

Keywords
growth tight, Hopf property, entropy, relatively hyperbolic groups, mapping class groups, snowflake groups, rank 1 isometries, CAT(0) groups
Mathematical Subject Classification 2010
Primary: 20E06, 20F65, 20F67, 37C35, 57MXX
Milestones
Received: 20 February 2015
Accepted: 2 March 2015
Published: 30 September 2015
Authors
Goulnara N. Arzhantseva
Fakultät für Mathematik
Univerität Wien
Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1
1090 Wien
Austria
Christopher H. Cashen
Fakultät Für Mathematik
Universität Wien
Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1
1090 Vienna
Austria
Jing Tao
Department of Mathematics
University of Oklahoma
601 Elm Avenue Rm 423
Norman, OK 73019
United States