Vol. 16, No. 2, 2021

Download this article
Download this article For screen
For printing
Recent Issues
Volume 16, Issue 2
Volume 16, Issue 1
Volume 15, Issue 2
Volume 15, Issue 1
Volume 14, Issue 2
Volume 14, Issue 1
Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 1
Volume 12, Issue 1
Volume 11, Issue 2
Volume 11, Issue 1
Volume 10, Issue 2
Volume 10, Issue 1
Volume 9, Issue 2
Volume 9, Issue 1
Volume 8, Issue 1
Volume 7, Issue 2
Volume 7, Issue 1
Volume 6, Issue 1
Volume 5, Issue 2
Volume 5, Issue 1
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1
The Journal
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Submission Guidelines
Submission Form
Policies for Authors
Ethics Statement
ISSN: 2157-5452 (e-only)
ISSN: 1559-3940 (print)
Author Index
To Appear
Other MSP Journals
This article is available for purchase or by subscription. See below.
Scalable computational measures for entropic detection of latent relations and their applications to magnetic imaging

Illia Horenko, Davi Rodrigues, Terence O’Kane and Karin Everschore-Sitte

Vol. 16 (2021), No. 2, 267–297

Detection of material inhomogeneities is an important task in magnetic imaging. For example, in spintronics, device efficiency is greatly impacted by sample heterogeneity. We demonstrate that the novel computationally-scalable data measures introduced in this manuscript — taking into account latent temporal relations between processes of interest — have the potential to assist current efforts to enhance the resolution of experimental techniques by providing key insights into the noisy observed data. We introduce two data relation measures — the latent dimension and the latent entropy — and analyse their mathematical and computational properties. We provide mathematical derivations of their analytic properties (e.g., monotonicity, boundedness and uniqueness) and prove the independence of the computational iteration complexity scaling of the introduced latent measures from the underlying data statistics sizes, making these measures particularly suitable for inference of latent effects in the big data applications with very large statistics sizes. Using a series of simulated and experimental magnetization data sets of increasing complexity we show that the introduced computational measures outperform considered common instruments in helping to reveal the magnetic material patterns and in the scaling of the computational cost with the data size. Introduced measures allow us to detect subtle material inhomogeneity patterns in the data which are not accessible to common data measures (like the mean, the autocorrelation and the Gaussian mixture entropy measures). For example, for a discrete heterogenous Ising model with magnetization constant anisotropy, we show that the proposed measures help to resolve exchange differences down to 1% even above the critical temperature. Furthermore, for a micromagnetic model, the latent entropy helps revealing material anisotropic inhomogeneity along components perpendicular to the main magnetization axis of the material where common data measures fail. For magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements, these data-driven tools can be used to visualize inhomogeneities and help to explicitly resolve impurities and pinning centres.

PDF Access Denied

However, your active subscription may be available on Project Euclid at

We have not been able to recognize your IP address as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by subscription, or purchase of single articles.

Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our journal-recom­mendation form. Or, visit our subscription page for instructions on purchasing a subscription.

You may also contact us at contact@msp.org
or by using our contact form.

Or, you may purchase this single article for USD 40.00:

detection of inhomogeneities, denoising, entropy, latent inference
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 37M25, 94A17
Secondary: 62H30, 62M05
Supplementary material

Data used for latent measure analysis

Received: 30 October 2020
Revised: 8 April 2021
Accepted: 10 May 2021
Published: 2 November 2021
Illia Horenko
Institute of Computation, Faculty of Informatics
Università della Svizzera Italiana
Davi Rodrigues
Department of Electrical and Information Engineering
Polytechnic University of Bari
Terence O’Kane
Climate Forecasting, CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere
Karin Everschore-Sitte
University of Duisburg-Essen
Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE)