#### Vol. 304, No. 2, 2020

 Recent Issues Vol. 310: 1 Vol. 309: 1  2 Vol. 308: 1  2 Vol. 307: 1  2 Vol. 306: 1  2 Vol. 305: 1  2 Vol. 304: 1  2 Vol. 303: 1  2 Online Archive Volume: Issue:
 The Journal Subscriptions Editorial Board Officers Contacts Submission Guidelines Submission Form Policies for Authors ISSN: 1945-5844 (e-only) ISSN: 0030-8730 (print) Special Issues Author Index To Appear Other MSP Journals
Gluing Bartnik extensions, continuity of the Bartnik mass, and the equivalence of definitions

### Stephen McCormick

Vol. 304 (2020), No. 2, 629–653
##### Abstract

In the context of the Bartnik mass, there are two fundamentally different notions of an extension of some compact Riemannian manifold $\left(\Omega ,\gamma \right)$ with boundary. In one case, the extension is taken to be a manifold without boundary in which $\left(\Omega ,\gamma \right)$ embeds isometrically, and in the other case the extension is taken to be a manifold with boundary where the boundary data is determined by $\partial \Omega$.

We give a type of convexity condition under which we can say both of these types of extensions indeed yield the same value for the Bartnik mass. Under the same hypotheses we prove that the Bartnik mass varies continuously with respect to the boundary data. This also provides a method to use estimates for the Bartnik mass of constant mean curvature (CMC) Bartnik data, to obtain estimates for the Bartnik mass of non-CMC Bartnik data. The key idea for these results is a method for gluing Bartnik extensions of given Bartnik data to other nearby Bartnik data.

However, your active subscription may be available on Project Euclid at
https://projecteuclid.org/pjm

We have not been able to recognize your IP address 18.210.12.229 as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by subscription, or purchase of single articles.

or by using our contact form.