The Arkansas Republican party invented an apportionment method for their 2016 presidential primary
that is a variant of the classical apportionment method Hamilton’s method. We provide a formula
for the probability that these two methods produce the same apportionment in three-candidate
elections, assuming all election outcomes are equally likely. We also prove that the method invented
by Arkansas Republicans is more favorable to lower-ranked candidates than Hamilton’s method.
PDF Access Denied
We have not been able to recognize your IP address
216.73.216.103
as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by
subscription, or purchase of single articles.
Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our
journal-recommendation form.
Or, visit our
subscription page
for instructions on purchasing a subscription.