This article is available for purchase or by subscription. See below.
Abstract
|
The Arkansas Republican party invented an apportionment method for their 2016 presidential primary
that is a variant of the classical apportionment method Hamilton’s method. We provide a formula
for the probability that these two methods produce the same apportionment in three-candidate
elections, assuming all election outcomes are equally likely. We also prove that the method invented
by Arkansas Republicans is more favorable to lower-ranked candidates than Hamilton’s method.
|
PDF Access Denied
We have not been able to recognize your IP address
18.97.14.87
as that of a subscriber to this journal.
Online access to the content of recent issues is by
subscription, or purchase of single articles.
Please contact your institution's librarian suggesting a subscription, for example by using our
journal-recommendation form.
Or, visit our
subscription page
for instructions on purchasing a subscription.
You may also contact us at
contact@msp.org
or by using our
contact form.
Or, you may purchase this single article for
USD 30.00:
Keywords
apportionment, Hamilton's method, presidential primaries
|
Mathematical Subject Classification
Primary: 91B10
Secondary: 91B14
|
Milestones
Received: 18 June 2021
Revised: 2 April 2022
Accepted: 27 February 2023
Published: 17 July 2024
Communicated by Kenneth S. Berenhaut
|
© 2024 MSP (Mathematical Sciences
Publishers). |
|